RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200917 SEPARATION DATE: 20050615
BOARD DATE: 20130124
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (92F20/Petroleum Supply Specialist),
medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CIs chronic LBP began in September
1999 when he fell from a confidence tower during training. He later reinjured it in 2004 in a
minor motor vehicle accident while deployed to Afghanistan. The chronic LBP condition did not
improve adequately with treatment to meet the physical requirements of his Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent
L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Mild posttraumatic stress
disorder (PTSD), identified in the rating chart below, was also identified and forwarded by the
MEB as meeting retention standards. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the
chronic LBP as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of AR 635-40 B-29, and the Veterans
Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PTSD condition was determined to meet
retention standards and therefore to be not unfitting and not ratable. The CI made no appeals,
and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: Based on time for resolvement (sic) being 1 month and time spent for
investigation was not adequate.
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The PTSD condition as implied for
consideration meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview and is addressed
below, in addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting LBP condition. Any conditions or
contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Boards defined scope of
review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military
Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB Dated 20050408
VA (8 Mos. Post-Separation) All Effective Date 20050614
Condition
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Chronic LBP
5237
10%
DJD, Lumbar Spine
5010-5237
10%
20060215
LRE Radiculopathy Assocd w/
DJD, Lumbar Spine
8599-8520
20%
20060215
Mild PTSD
Not Unfitting
PTSD
9411
10%
20060322
.No Additional MEB/PEB Entries.
Stomach Ulcers w/ GERD
7346
10%
20060215
Lt Elbow Nerve Damage S/P
Ulnar Nerve Transplant
8599-8515
10%
20060215
0% X 2 / Not Service-Connected x 1
Combined: 10%
Combined: 50%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in
evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with
documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.
Thoracolumbar ROM
(degrees)
MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~8 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)
(45) 42/46/43
90
Ext (0-30)
(20) 20/22/22
30
R Lat Flex (0-30)
(30) 34/28/30
30
L Lat Flex (0-30)
(30) 40/44/44
30
R Rotation (0-30)
(30) 36/36/34
0-180 per examiner
L Rotation (0-30)
(30) 37/32/30
0-180 per examiner
Combined (240)
185
Not ascertainable
Comment: VASRD
Spine notes 2 and 4
applied
Pain with movement; tenderness,
occasional radiation to R thigh; motor
sensory and reflex exams normal
No pain with ROM, no
spasm, no paresthesia,
normal gait
§4.71a Rating
20% (PEB 10%)
10%
At the MEB exam in January 2005, 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported constant
aching pain in the middle of his lower back, with occasional pain and numbness radiating to his
right thigh. His pain was increased by prolonged sitting or standing, running, lumbar flexion,
and lifting moderately heavy objects. He reported no lower extremity weakness. He also
reported a history of radiating numbness into the right thigh and 3-4 episodes of urinary
incontinence during September 2004, without fecal incontinence. The MEB physical exam
noted tenderness to palpation from L2-S1, tight paraspinal musculature, and a negative straight
leg raise. The lower extremity muscle strength, sensation, and reflexes were normal. The ROM
measurements are depicted in the chart, above. The average ROM for forward flexion was 45
degrees, and the average combined thoracolumbar ROM was 185 degrees. Magnetic
resonance imaging in September 2004 showed L4-5 dessication without disc protrusion or
spinal stenosis. Lumbar spine X-rays, in September 2004, were normal. At the MEB addendum
exam in March 2005, (3 months prior to separation), the CI reported chronic LBP ranging from
6-8 out of 10 in intensity. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam in February 2006, 8
months after separation, noted a normal spine exam, without joint swelling, effusion, or
tenderness. The exam indicated: no pain with ROM; no muscle atrophy or spasm; no
abnormalities of strength, sensation, or reflexes; no lower extremity paresthesia; a normal gait;
no assistive aids; and no effects on activities of daily living resulting from lower back pain. The
ROM was as in the chart, above. The exam cited a lumbar spine X-ray of unspecified date which
showed normal alignment and configuration of the vertebral bodies. A lumbar myelogram with
CT scan performed at a civilian hospital in June 2006, a year after separation, showed normal
disc appearance, without significant bulge, herniation, stenosis, or foraminal encroachment.
The PEB rated the low back condition coded 5237 at 10% citing ROM studies indicate flexion of
46 degrees; however, there is no evidence of mechanical block. Mechanical block is
referenced in AR 635-40, B-29, but is not considered in VASRD-only ratings. The VA Rating
Decision (VARD) assigned a rating of 10% for code 5237, based on painful motion, without
additional limitations related to fatigue, incoordination, weakness, or lack of endurance. An
additional rating of 20% for code 8520 was assigned for lower right extremity radiculopathy,
based on incomplete paralysis below the knee.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
MEB exam was closer to the date of separation and the Board agreed that the MEB exam was
more complete and held higher probative value for rating the chronic LBP at separation. The
MEB disability picture also more closely aligned with the disability picture in the remainder of
the treatment record. The MEB exam (and ROM noted on the PEB) meets the 5237 VASRD 20%
rating criteria of Forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not
greater than 60 degrees. The spine rating using the general rating formula for diseases and
injuries of the spine is with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates),
stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease. There was
no evidence of objective neurologic abnormalities associated with the chronic LBP condition on
either the MEB or C&P exams, although the VARD indicated the C&P exam showed decrease
strength with pain causing a moderate affect of daily activities. After due deliberation,
considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of reasonable doubt) and
§4.7 (Higher of two evaluations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the
chronic LBP condition.
Other PEB Condition. The other condition forwarded by the MEB and adjudicated as not
unfitting by the PEB was mild PTSD. PTSD was not profiled prior to, or at the time of, the MEB.
No mental health condition was implicated in the commanders statement as impairing the CIs
duty performance or noted as failing retention standards. PTSD was reviewed by the action
officer and considered by the Board. The psychiatric narrative summary addendum indicated a
diagnosis of anxiety disorder not otherwise specified. The examiner stated, Psychologically,
the patient suffers little to no impairment that would further impair his functioning in civilian or
military life psychologically. There was no indication from the record that the condition
significantly interfered with the satisfactory performance of MOS duty requirements. After due
deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that
there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the
PTSD condition (or any other mental disorder condition) and so no additional disability rating is
recommended.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
likely reliance on AR 635-40, B-29, for assigning the 10% rating was apparently operant in this
case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the
matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of
20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the mild PTSD condition, the Board
unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determination as not unfitting. There were
no other conditions within the Boards scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE
RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain
5237
20%
COMBINED
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120614, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxx), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20130005078 (PD201200917)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Boards recommendation to modify the individuals disability rating 20%
without recharacterization of the individuals separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 00906
The VARD also noted the absence of radicular findings and no recording of ROM (the CI refused testing).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB rated the condition for ROM limited by pain, coded 5237, and assigned a rating of 0%.The VA rated the condition under code 5242, 10% for muscle spasm.Under the applicable spine rules, a rating of 10% requires cervical spine flexion of greater than 30 degrees but less than 40 degrees or a combined...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01253
Two weeks later, he was medically evaluated and given a muscle relaxant medication, which improved his symptoms. The Board considered the MEB NARSUM to be the most probative for a rating at the time of separation because it was the most proximate to the date of separation, and consistent withthe onset of pain limitations from the VA C&P examination and the MEB physical examination. The MEB physical exam on 12 July 2004, 4 months prior to separation, noted decreased and painful cervical...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01622
It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back, neck and bilateral foot pain conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. In the matter of the bilateral foot pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793
I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00541
The Board therefore recommends rating the headache and chronic neck pain conditions together as one unfitting condition as discussed below. The PEB’s 10% rating for neck pain with associated headaches under code 5299-5237 noted “thoracolumbar combined ROM 230 degrees.” At the C&P exam in July 2004, 5 month after separation, the CI reported intermittent, LBP without radiation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01028
The Board evaluates VA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The low back pain also radiated to the left buttock, hip and the upper anterior left thigh including “left sacroiliac joint pain, which is thought to be related to the low back pain.” X-rays of the lumbar spine and sacroiliac joints were normal; MRI of the...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01855
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The PEB rated the chronic neck pain 0%, coded 5237 (cervical strain) and the VA rated it 20%.The Board considered that the CI was noted to have painful, mildly limited cervical ROM without noted muscle spasm at the MEB...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02326
Formal MEB PT goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) testing of the thoracolumbar spine was performed on 15 December 2006 (approximately 5 months prior to separation) and documented forward flexion of 20 degrees (normal 90) and combined ROM of 120 degrees (normal 240). The PEB disability description indicated the rating was based on tenderness and ROM limited by pain, but did not specify ROM values or detail which ROM exam was used for rating. Additionally, the CI had continuing and recurring...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02748
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. DoD Physical...